PHILIP HULBIG PH.D.
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Assessments
    • Figure Wieghts
    • Sensory Investigation
    • Stroop task
    • Short term memory test
    • Critical thinking test
    • Letter-number sequence
    • Vis. Prob. Mental Rotation
    • Coding
    • Symbol search
    • Block Design
    • Vocabulary
    • Matrix Reasoning
    • Picture Completion
    • Comprehension
    • Visual puzzles
    • organize dots
    • Similarities
    • Cancellation
    • Multiple intelligence test
    • Right Left Brain Test
    • Go no go
    • Inhibition test
    • Echo list JOL
    • Two trails
    • Tower task
    • The Adult Lens
    • Learner Ledger Character Sheet
    • Self portrait
    • D&D character sheet
    • Crypto mon
  • WPS Spinner
  • Blog
  • Students
  • Families
  • Classrooms
The Adult Lens — Research Version
Hulbig Center · Curry College · Research Study
The Adult Lens
Understanding Adults & Young People
Informed Consent

Consent to participate in research

Study title: The Adult Lens: How Adults Understand and Respond to Young People's Behavior

Principal Investigator: Philip R. Hulbig, Ph.D., Program for Advancement of Learning, Curry College — [email protected]

What this study is about. You are invited to take part in a research study about how adults interpret young people's behavior and their views on child-rearing and educational practices, past and present. You will respond to rating statements, read three short everyday scenarios and choose the explanation closest to your first read, and answer questions about educational practices across generations. Two brief background questions at the end are entirely optional.

Time. The survey takes approximately 20–25 minutes.

Who can take part. Adults age 18 or older.

Voluntary participation. Your participation is completely voluntary. You may skip any question, and you may stop at any time by closing this page. Only responses you submit at the end are recorded.

Anonymity and data. No names, email addresses, IP addresses, or other identifying information are collected at any point. Your anonymous responses are transmitted to a secured research spreadsheet accessible only to the research team. Because responses are anonymous, they cannot be withdrawn after submission, as there is no way to identify which responses are yours.

Risks. Risks are minimal. Some statements describe strict or harsh child-rearing practices used historically; you may find some of them uncomfortable to consider. You may skip any item.

Benefits. There is no compensation. At the end you will receive a personalized reflective summary of your own responses, which many participants find valuable for their own practice with young people.

Questions. Questions about the study may be directed to the Principal Investigator at the email above. Questions about your rights as a research participant may be directed to the Curry College Institutional Review Board at [email protected].

IRB approval: [IRB APPROVAL NUMBER AND DATE — insert before recruitment]

You may print or save this page for your records before beginning.
Section 1 of 5 · Perspectives

Adults, young people, and whose perspective counts

Rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). Go with your first honest reaction. You may leave any item blank.

Section 2 of 5 · Scenarios

Scenario

Which of these is closest to your first read of what's going on?

50%
Section 3 of 5 · Responses

Structure, control, and what young people need

Rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). You may leave any item blank.

Section 4 of 5 · Child-Rearing Views

Child-rearing in the past and nowadays

In your opinion, which generation was the last to apply “old fashioned” educational practices?

Statements about the education of children

Here follow some statements about practices concerning the education of children drawn from the psychological and pedagogical literature on the topic. Read each sentence and mark the number indicating your level of agreement, according to the following response scale:

1 = Fully disagree (You fully disagree with the statement)  ·  2 = Slightly agree (You mainly disagree with the statement, but you find yourself in agreement with a part of it)  ·  3 = Agree (The statement is close to your thought)  ·  4 = Fully agree (The statement reflects exactly what you think)
Section 5 of 5 · Then and Now

How widespread were — and are — these practices?

For this section, please use the following response scale:

1 = Not present at all  ·  2 = Present, but not common  ·  3 = Present  ·  4 = Widespread

In your opinion, how much were the following measures widespread as “old fashioned” educational means?

According to your experience, to what extent are “old fashioned” educational means still in use nowadays?

Optional · About You

A couple of brief background questions

Entirely optional — skip either or both if you'd rather not answer. These questions help researchers describe the study sample as a whole; they are never used to identify anyone.

What is your gender?

What is your race and/or ethnicity? (Select all that apply.)

Your reflection · Study debrief

What your lens looks like

Adultcentrism Index
--
Reading Openness
--
Bleak Pedagogy Index
--

Your scores on the Black Pedagogy Scale

Sections 4 and 5 were the Black Pedagogy Scale, a published research instrument (see debrief below).

Total (24–96)
--
Subscales
Diffusion: past → now
--

The connection, in three moves

Input

What you let in. An adultcentric lens filters the young person's own testimony out of the evidence — their words count less, so less reaches your model of them.

Processing

How you interpret — and whether you check. The blind spot isn't holding a wrong read; it's holding it confidently and closing early, without asking. Confidence without checking is the monitoring failure.

Output

What you do. Acting on a confident misread tends toward control: consequences, compliance, tighter structure. That is control doing the work that curiosity should have done.

Three questions to sit with

  • Think of the last time a young person's behavior confused or frustrated you. Did you ask them what was going on — or did you decide what was going on?
  • When was the last time a young person's perspective actually changed something you do? If you can't think of one, what does that say about the direction information flows?
  • Where in your day could “I know what this is” become “I wonder what this is”?

About this study (debrief)

This study examines a theorized chain linking adultcentrism (over-weighting adult interpretations of young people's behavior), metacognitive monitoring (whether high confidence in a read is paired with checking it), and Bleak Pedagogy (control-oriented teaching and caregiving responses), framed in the Wholistic Problem Solving Input–Processing–Output structure and Nelson & Narens' model of metacognitive monitoring and control. Sections 4–5 reproduced the Black Pedagogy Scale (Florio, E., Caso, L., & Castelli, I., 2020, “The Black Pedagogy Scale: A New Task to Explore Educational Practices for Children's Well-Being,” Europe's Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 331–351, doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i2.1876), an open-access instrument distributed under a CC-BY 4.0 license and used here in the authors' English translation for exploratory research purposes. Your personal results above are reflective, not diagnostic. Questions: [email protected].

Copied ✓
Interpretive framework © Hulbig Center, LLC. Black Pedagogy Scale © Florio, Caso, & Castelli (2020), CC-BY 4.0. Reflective use of personal results only — not a diagnostic instrument.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Assessments
    • Figure Wieghts
    • Sensory Investigation
    • Stroop task
    • Short term memory test
    • Critical thinking test
    • Letter-number sequence
    • Vis. Prob. Mental Rotation
    • Coding
    • Symbol search
    • Block Design
    • Vocabulary
    • Matrix Reasoning
    • Picture Completion
    • Comprehension
    • Visual puzzles
    • organize dots
    • Similarities
    • Cancellation
    • Multiple intelligence test
    • Right Left Brain Test
    • Go no go
    • Inhibition test
    • Echo list JOL
    • Two trails
    • Tower task
    • The Adult Lens
    • Learner Ledger Character Sheet
    • Self portrait
    • D&D character sheet
    • Crypto mon
  • WPS Spinner
  • Blog
  • Students
  • Families
  • Classrooms